In recent political dialogues, the alarming prospect of a third world war has become a prominent theme. This rhetorical strategy spans across the political spectrum, from former President Donald Trump to various influential figures worldwide.

Former President Trump, in his recent communications, has emphasized his role in preventing such a catastrophic event, criticizing his political adversaries for pushing the world to the brink of another global conflict. This narrative has become a focal point in his political resurgence, as seen in his fundraising emails and campaign speeches.

The backdrop of these discussions is the escalating tensions in global hotspots like Ukraine and the Middle East. A survey by the American Psychological Association highlighted public concern, with a significant majority of Americans expressing fear about the onset of World War III following Russia's invasion of Ukraine.

Photo illustration for TIME by Lon Tweeten; Source images: Melina Mara-Pool/Getty Images

However, this narrative isn't confined to one political side. Figures from various political backgrounds, including Democratic Senator Tim Kaine and biotech entrepreneur Vivek Ramaswamy, have echoed these sentiments. The use of World War III as a metaphor or rhetorical device extends to critiques of international conflicts, such as the Israel-Gaza situation, and broader geopolitical tensions.

Despite the frequent use of this term, experts like Jay Winter, a renowned 20th-century war historian, caution against overstating current conflicts as precursors to a world war. The definition of a world war, involving major power blocs in widespread conflict, doesn't precisely fit the current international disputes, according to many experts.

Even President Biden has referenced the risk of a world war, especially in the context of Russia's actions in Ukraine. His administration's language, while cautious, reflects a conscious effort to avoid escalating tensions.

The rhetoric around World War III is not just limited to political discourse in the United States. Allies of the Kremlin have also used this term to shape the narrative around the Ukraine conflict, as noted by experts like Bryan Frederick from the RAND Corporation.

In essence, the invocation of World War III in political rhetoric serves multiple purposes. It acts as a powerful tool to capture public attention and frame ongoing conflicts in a historical context. However, it also risks overshadowing more nuanced discussions about foreign policy and international relations. The term's evocative nature and historical weight make it a potent yet potentially misleading element in contemporary political communication.

As global tensions persist, the conversation around World War III reflects broader concerns about international stability and the potential for widespread conflict. While the term may capture the public imagination, it requires careful consideration and analysis to understand its implications in today's complex geopolitical landscape.